🔗 Share this article

This move from the Democratic National Committee to suppress the public viewing regarding its own post-election analysis concerning the last presidential race appears stunning however to be expected. Averse to hard truths, the DNC behaves more like a publicity machine than a political organization focused on building local power for winning elections.

An Environment That Avoids Dissent

Unwilling to depart from the prevailing attitude demanding unity, the DNC has stayed within the Biden-Harris shadow all through this past year. Making public such a report could have demonstrated that party leaders are interested to promote open debate regarding the strategic failures that paved the way for the former president to win re-election. Instead, the leadership is moving forward as if there's nothing to understand following the stunning loss from the last cycle.

The top priority: does this help us win? Should the answer be negative, it becomes a sideline issue from our fundamental goal," a rationale reportedly given for withholding the analysis.

Major Failures a Report Would Have Examined

Any valuable post-mortem with any value would tackle head-on certain uncomfortable matters. This encompasses:

• Electoral Alienation: Losing of a significant portion of the electorate who supported the party's candidate during the previous election proved pivotal in the narrowly decided recent race.
• The Choice to Run: The stubborn decision of the incumbent to stay in the race, alongside an extremely delayed step-aside, is viewed as denying the party's base the chance for a competitive nomination process.
• Abandoning the Working-Class Base: Amid economic anxiety, the electoral effort is criticized for ceding to corporate donors' interests while failing to confront the role of corporate greed.
• A Gaza Factor: An unwillingness to adjust a stance regarding the situation in Gaza is cited as driving away significant blocs, notably among youth voters, Arab-Americans, and Muslim Americans.
• A Decline in Youth Allegiance: Polling data demonstrates a huge drop-off in votes for the candidate from the youth electorate.

A Record Avoiding Accountability

The decision to withhold aligns with a longstanding habit of evading hard truths. This mirrors an episode where virtually every Democratic officeholder in Congress acquiesced to an incumbent's insistence on running for re-election until a poor televised debate forced an exit.

Meanwhile, overwhelming numbers within the party's base were continually telling pollsters that they did not want the incumbent to be the nominee.

Financial Concerns

An honest analysis could probe issues regarding where money went, including what sums were directed to high-priced advisors as well as ad buyers over the course of a campaign which expended a staggering amount over a few months.

A Larger Implication

Fundamentally, the secrecy surrounding this report points to a deference toward the existing power structure that oversaw an unsuccessful presidential campaign. The signal for rank-and-file members – including countless small donors – is that they cannot be trusted to understand what the leadership have learned from hundreds of interviews based on feedback from all states.

A political entity unable to publicly examine its mistakes will struggle to climb out of the rut which was so beneficial to the rival party.